Cavities are compared using Shaper.
For more information, please see the following publication:
Desaphy J. et al. Comparison and Druggability Prediction of protein-Ligand Binding sites from pharmacophore-annotated cavity shapes J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2012, 52(8), pp2287-2299
| PDB ID | HET | Uniprot Name | EC Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2fzm | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | 1.5.5.2 |
| PDB ID | HET | Uniprot Name | EC Number | Cavity Similarity |
Align |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2fzm | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | 1.5.5.2 | 1.000 | |
| 1tj1 | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | 1.5.5.2 | 0.739 | |
| 1tj2 | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | 1.5.5.2 | 0.730 | |
| 2fzn | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | 1.5.5.2 | 0.676 | |
| 4o8a | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | 1.2.1.88 | 0.592 | |
| 3e2s | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | 1.5.5.2 | 0.565 | |
| 3haz | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | / | 0.555 | |
| 1tj0 | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | 1.5.5.2 | 0.544 | |
| 4q72 | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | / | 0.473 | |
| 4q73 | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | / | 0.472 | |
| 4q71 | FAD | Bifunctional protein PutA | / | 0.442 |